life inc. – Three Percent /College/translation/threepercent a resource for international literature at the University of Rochester Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:24:11 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 Douglas Rushkoff's Optimism about the Book Industry /College/translation/threepercent/2009/08/26/douglas-rushkoffs-optimism-about-the-book-industry/ /College/translation/threepercent/2009/08/26/douglas-rushkoffs-optimism-about-the-book-industry/#respond Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:21:15 +0000 http://www.wdev.rochester.edu/College/translation/threepercent-dev/2009/08/26/douglas-rushkoffs-optimism-about-the-book-industry/ PW‘s Soapbox pieces can be a bit hit-or-miss, but the (author of several books, including which, along with Gaddis’s should be mandatory reading for all business school students) is pretty fantastic.

There’s nothing particularly new in Rushkoff’s depiction of what’s happened to the book industry, but it’s always good to be reminded of how the corporate structure has screwed with culture in such an insidious way (Andre Schiffrin’s also offers a great look at how the corporate consolidation went down):

Publishing is a sustainable industry—and a great one at that. The book business, however, was never a good fit for today’s corporate behemoths. The corporations that went on spending sprees in the 1980s and ’90s were not truly interested in the art of publishing. These conglomerates, from Time Warner to Vivendi, are really just holding companies. They service their shareholders by servicing debt more rapidly than they accrue it. Their businesses are really just the stories they use to garner more investment capital. In order to continue leveraging debt, they need to demonstrate growth. The problem is that media, especially books, can’t offer enough organic growth—people can only read so many books from so many authors.

So begins consolidation. In order to achieve the growth shareholders demand but the businesses can’t supply, corporations embark upon mergers and acquisitions, even though, in the long run, nearly 80% of all mergers and acquisitions fail to create value for either party. [. . .]

The same thinking led the conglomerates to hone in on publishing. Top-heavy, centralized bureaucracies know how to work with a B&N better than with a Cody’s or a Spring Street Books. And they applied their generic corporate management to a ragtag crew of book nerds, most of whom wouldn’t—and shouldn’t—know a balance sheet if their lives depended on it. Finally, unable to grow as fast as their debt structures demanded, these corporations have resorted to slashing expenses.

This we already know. (Some of my friends know this more personally and directly than others.) But what I like about Rushkoff’s piece is his optimism about the future:

The good news is that much of this talent—book editors, publicists and sellers—is ready to rebuild what Wall Street has seen fit to destroy. Book enthusiasts are not giving up. I get e-mails constantly from editors asking if I’m interested in writing books for their new, independent publishing houses. Many offer smaller advances but higher royalties and more attention to details—like the quality of my writing. I also get correspondence from people opening independent bookstores in the shadows of vacant outlets, stores that would be happy with a hundredth of the sales volume that made their larger counterparts unsustainable.

Behind the bad news, there is much to look forward to. Our industry has for too long favored those skilled at negotiating the corporate ladder and punished those who simply publish great books. Now that publishing has revealed itself to be a bad growth industry, it is free to rebuild itself as the vibrant, scaled and sustainable business the reading public can support.

Right on! Book lovers of the world, unite!

But seriously, I think there really is something to this. Look at all the great new presses and bookstores—mostly started by relatively young people with a lot of passion and energy. For any number of reasons—struggles of corporate publishing, e-books, implosion of chain retail stores, etc.—the next few years should be very interesting. (Although I can already see the comment below about how none of this matters since everyone spends all their time online instead of reading and kids hate books and etc., etc.)

]]>
/College/translation/threepercent/2009/08/26/douglas-rushkoffs-optimism-about-the-book-industry/feed/ 0
Life Incorporated /College/translation/threepercent/2009/05/12/life-incorporated/ /College/translation/threepercent/2009/05/12/life-incorporated/#respond Tue, 12 May 2009 14:41:57 +0000 http://www.wdev.rochester.edu/College/translation/threepercent-dev/2009/05/12/life-incorporated/ A few weeks ago we posted a brief interview that Jason Boog of GalleyCat conducted with Douglas Rushkoff about conglomerates and the media. This interview tied into Rushkoff’s latest book — Life Inc.: How the World Became a Corporation and How to Take It Back — which is a fantastic critique of the rise of corporations and the negative influence the principles underlying corporations have had on virtually every aspect of our life.

We’re planning on running an interview with Douglas about the book and about corporations and publishing (irony #1: Life Inc is coming out in June from Random House) in the not-too-distant future, but since this is such a fantastic, important book, I thought I’d point out the book’s and “Life Inc The Movie,” which hits on some of the major points of the book. (It’s kind of like a videobook! )

The book releases on June 2nd, but is from, well, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Borders. (Irony #2.)

One of the interesting examples Douglas uses in this video is the bit about the restaurant Comfort and the owner’s inability to secure a bank loan for expansion. When this happened, he came up with the idea of “Comfort Dollars” through which, for every $100 invested, you received $120 Comfort Dollars to spend at the restaurant, thereby helping this local business to expand, and receiving a 20% return on investment . . . This isn’t unlike our through which for every $120 “investment,” you receive approx. $180 worth of Open Letter books . . . From our perspective, it’s great to know that X number of units of a new book are going directly to readers the second the book comes back from the printer, and for readers, you’re receiving $1.50 worth of books for every $1 spend . . .

]]>
/College/translation/threepercent/2009/05/12/life-incorporated/feed/ 0
Douglas Rushkoff Tells It Like It Is /College/translation/threepercent/2009/03/27/douglas-rushkoff-tells-it-like-it-is/ /College/translation/threepercent/2009/03/27/douglas-rushkoff-tells-it-like-it-is/#respond Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:29:24 +0000 http://www.wdev.rochester.edu/College/translation/threepercent-dev/2009/03/27/douglas-rushkoff-tells-it-like-it-is/ Over at Jason Boog posted a two-minute video with Douglas Rushkoff (whose new book Life Inc.: How the World Became a Corporation and How to Take It Back is at the very top of my galley reading stack) about media conglomerates.

Not necessarily anything that hasn’t been said before, but I love the line about corporations being “an interface between shareholders and banks,” and that the music (and by extension, publishing) business has “removed the competence from their industry.”

BTW, Life, which comes out in June is published by Random House.

]]>
/College/translation/threepercent/2009/03/27/douglas-rushkoff-tells-it-like-it-is/feed/ 0