public funding for the arts – Three Percent /College/translation/threepercent a resource for international literature at the University of Rochester Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:24:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 NEA Back in the Stimulus /College/translation/threepercent/2009/02/16/nea-back-in-the-stimulus/ /College/translation/threepercent/2009/02/16/nea-back-in-the-stimulus/#respond Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:11:16 +0000 http://www.wdev.rochester.edu/College/translation/threepercent-dev/2009/02/16/nea-back-in-the-stimulus/ It was incredible to run into Jim Sitter (consultant and the only lobbyist in America for literature) late Friday night at AWP and find out that miraculously, the proposed $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts had made it back into the stimulus package. Jim’s usually the man with the bad news . . . and even after he told me, I only half believed this was true.

But as reported in the it is:

The extra $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts is a significant boost for the agency, whose annual budget, without the additional money, was $145 million. The bill calls for 40 percent of the new money to be distributed by formula to state arts agencies and regional arts organizations. The remaining 60 percent will be set aside for individual arts projects competing for Endowment grants.

It’s even more rewarding to hear that Representative Louise Slaughter—from New York’s 28th district, which includes Rochester—was one of the people who made this happen.

Sure, not everything arts people wanted was reinserted into the bill. Pieces of the Coburn amendment are still there, including restriction that no stimulus money can be spent on zoos, aquariums, and swimming pools. But still, as others have said, there might be money from other pieces of the bill (such as education funding) that end up benefiting artists and the arts in general.

]]>
/College/translation/threepercent/2009/02/16/nea-back-in-the-stimulus/feed/ 0
Arts Funding and Government Waste /College/translation/threepercent/2009/02/10/arts-funding-and-government-waste/ /College/translation/threepercent/2009/02/10/arts-funding-and-government-waste/#respond Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:05:01 +0000 http://www.wdev.rochester.edu/College/translation/threepercent-dev/2009/02/10/arts-funding-and-government-waste/ OK, I won’t say anything at all about the government letting us down, or but I do want to point out one really sad fact about the nation we live in—looks like the government will spend $62 billion on keeping the F-22 raptor alive (a plane designed during the Cold War and criticized by basically everyone), but won’t spend a dime of the $800+ billion allocated to restart the economy on a public park, museum, or arts museum.

The has a great piece by Christopher Knight about this, including a bit comparing the F-22 promotional materials to info from Americans for the Arts:

The F-22 provides $12 billion annually in national economic activity through 25,000 jobs in 44 states, as well as another 70,000 that are indirectly affected by the program. Meanwhile, the national lobbying group Americans for the Arts says the country’s 5.7-million workers in the nonprofit culture industry contribute $166 billion to the annual economy.

But rather than spend a dime on culture, we piss away spend $62 billion on obsolete, and unneeded, fighter jets. Greatest. Country. In. The. World.

I couldn’t agree more with Knight’s conclusion:

Sounds good — but do I really think a beneficial cultural stimulus package has a snowball’s chance in Hades of happening? No. How about that wasteful F-22 funding? Yes; in fact I’ll be shocked if it doesn’t.

Why? Because ever since a bunch of farmers, merchants and other small-businesspeople fought the American Revolution against the East India Company and its nominal CEO, King George III, corporations have been the nation’s primary obstacle to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They still are.

Culture is all about pursuing happiness, so even in a crisis it barely stands a chance. If you doubt it, ask the Wall Street bankers who have gotten hundreds of billions in bailouts and bonuses — and stand to get more. Then ask your senator or representative, who can’t get elected without them.

]]>
/College/translation/threepercent/2009/02/10/arts-funding-and-government-waste/feed/ 0