
When communicates with her peers about reforming troubled school districts, she does so with journal articles such as System-wide Reform in Districts Under Pressure: The Role of Social Networks in Defining, Acquiring, Using, and Diffusing Research Evidence.
Or with presentations at academic conferences on such topics as “A Tale of Two Districts: The Importance of Collegiality in Urban Education Reform” or “Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Leadership Churn Under Accountability Policies.”
But when the associate professor of educational policy at the wants to communicate with the policymakers who bring reform about — or with parents and other stakeholders who will be affected — she starts by talking about Horton the elephant.
Thats right: the Dr. Seuss character who placed a speck of dust on a flower and discovered Whoville inside.
Finnigan is not speaking down to her audiences when she talks about Horton; rather, she explains, shes dangling a hook to attract and hold the audiences attention. Shes acknowledging that scholars need to find different ways to communicate their work to non-academics if scholarly research is to have the broadest possible impact. Otherwise, nobodys going to pay attention, she says.
The importance of this kind of was brought home to Finnigan this year when she was one of 32 scholars chosen by the American Educational Research Association to participate in a to better connect research and policy.
This included nearly two days of training in how to give TED-like ED talks to:
- Build a stronger bridge between research and policy
- Strengthen understanding of the knowledge base in the field
- Prompt dialogue
It was a very humbling experience for everybody, says Finnigan. These are top scholars who are used to having more time and space to get into the complexities. These are scholars who want you to know the complexities.
Instead they had to do just the opposite. They had to limit their presentations to five to six minutes. They had to concentrate on key points. Avoid academic jargon. Find a hook that non-specialists could relate to.
And they had to think at least as much about their presentation skills as their content. Speaking clearly. Making eye contact. Not cluttering the slides with too much data.
They forced us to think about the bare bones ideas that we want to make sure people take way. The purpose is to engage people enough so they will then want to go to the papers and other things youve done for more information, Finnigan says.
Shes pleased by the feedback shes received, not just from these talks, but the blogs () she writes to communicate her findings.
I didnt realize how much people had an appetite for this, until I tried these different mechanisms, she says.
As academics, we tend to sit in our silos, but the cross-fertilization that occurs when we step out of those silos is what can really bring us to new levels. This is not just about getting my information out for somebody else to take up. I get information back, which pushes me further.
And yes, the hooks do work, she says. People who have heard her ED talk will later meet her, for example, and say, Oh, I remember. You talked about Horton. Its an easy shorthand instead of having to remember a talks actual title.
So what does Horton the elephant have to do with school reform?
When Horton looked very closely at that speck of dust, he discovered a community that everybody else overlooked. It provides a nice analogy for Finnigans premise that successful reform of troubled K-12 school districts requires a close look at the layers of the system, in order to build stronger relationships, for example, between central office administrators and school-based principals. It also requires focusing on geographic inequities that concentrate students from the poorest neighborhoods in inner city schools.
Too often we pay too much attention to simple solutions without paying attention to the underlying complexities and layers of an educational system that need to be tended to, Finnigan says.
泭
